Why Didn’t AARP ‘Show Congress the Money’? A provision to provide disabled Medicare beneficiaries better coverage was dropped from the legislation during congressional negotiations because it would have increased Medicare costs, according to a House Democratic congressional aide.” That’s where AARP comes in.

The Post article conceded that Obamacare “does not address this issue. And because traditional Medicare does not provide a catastrophic cap on patient cost-sharing (Medigap plans often provide that coverage instead), disabled beneficiaries who want to remain in traditional Medicare (as opposed to Medicare Advantage plans offered by private insurers) may face unlimited out-of-pocket spending. In other words, the most vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries-those enrolled because they receive Social Security disability benefits-often cannot obtain Medigap coverage due to pre-existing conditions. “However, when Congress created this protection in 1992…it exempted disabled Medicare beneficiaries under age 65, a group that now totals 8 million people.” Obamacare exempted Medigap supplemental insurance plans from all of its “reforms,” including the prohibition on “discriminating” against individuals with pre-existing conditions.Īs a 2011 Washington Post article noted, individuals can apply for Medigap plans when they first turn 65 and become eligible for Medicare. Obamacare and Pre-Existing ConditionsĮven though an article on AARP’s own website states that, as of 2014, “insurance companies required to sell policies to anyone, regardless of their pre-existing medical conditions,” that claim isn’t quite accurate.

After all, didn’t Obamacare supposedly prohibit “discrimination” against individuals with pre-existing conditions? But what if I told you that the organization raking in all those profits was none other than AARP, the organization that claims to represent seniors? Then the profits might make more sense.

Shady business practices